of one year’s profits: modeled expected supply-chain disruption losses across a decade.
Cross-industry value-chain analysisDecision-intelligence platform for manufacturers and logistics operators
From disruption signal to an executable decision.
CrisisFlow detects disruptions across the value chain, identifies exposed sites, suppliers, and routes, quantifies the likely operational and financial impact, and ranks feasible responses under real budget and time constraints—before losses compound.
CrisisFlow supports the full management cycle—from preparation and mitigation through response, recovery, and learning—while keeping evidence, decisions, actions, and outcomes connected in one auditable record.
01 / The operating condition
Disruption is persistent. Preparedness is not.
The problem is no longer recognizing that risk exists. It is identifying which operations and commitments are exposed, estimating the operational and financial consequences, and choosing a response that can actually be executed.
Evidence details and limitationsfirm–country-pair geopolitical shock events in a study of 6,645 internationally active firms.
(Ballesteros, 2026) · scope & method →82%rated geopolitical events a moderate-to-significant supply-chain risk
25%said they were very prepared for trade-policy changes or new tariffs
2025 North American survey · 152 senior operations, supply-chain, and IT professionals02 / Prepared operating model
The advantage begins before the disruption.
CrisisFlow starts with a prepared disruption operating model—not an empty dashboard. Its hazard taxonomy, exposure pathways, action library, constraint schema, evidence rules, and decision-right patterns create a structured starting point before the first event enters the system.
PREPARED ENTERPRISE / REVIEWED 14 SEP 2026Coverage state
Critical commitmentsNamed and prioritized
Dependency pathsDirect, indirect, unresolved
Action prerequisitesQualification and capacity
Decision rightsOwner, approver, review date
NaturalGeopoliticalMarketDigital
One enterprise model. Hazard-specific evidence logic.
03 / Hazard-specific logic
One enterprise model. Different exposure mechanisms.
CrisisFlow connects four disruption families without treating their evidence as interchangeable. Source authority, usage rights, time horizon, and limitations remain attached to the decision.
Inspect the evidence & method04 / Decision continuity
One record traces the decision from evidence to outcome.
Risk intelligence knows the event. ERP knows the transaction. Planning knows the scenario. Workflow knows the task. CrisisFlow keeps the versioned decision connecting what was known, inferred, compared, authorized, executed, and learned.
- SourceObserved
- ExposureSupported
- ConsequenceModeled
- PortfolioCalculated
- AuthorityHuman
- OutcomeReviewed
Verified or authorized Conditional or unresolved
05 / Four-module loop
Four modules cover the full management cycle.
Detect prepares and mitigates by mapping dependencies, buffers, alternatives, and decision rights before an event, then identifies what changed and what is exposed. Decide quantifies consequences and compares feasible responses. Act coordinates response, stabilization, and recovery. Learn records outcomes and strengthens the next cycle.
Explore the interactive case- 01DetectPrepare, mitigate, and resolve exposure
- 02DecideWhat is at stake and feasible?
- 03ActRespond, stabilize, and recover
- 04LearnObserve, adapt, and update the next cycle
06 / Quantitative decision proof
Choose a portfolio, not a list.
Actions compete for the same budget, capacity, lead time, qualifications, contracts, and authority. CrisisFlow compares them together and shows what changed the result.
BOUNDARY / PUBLIC CASE5 actions · 32 complete portfolios
Declared objective
3 × priority shortfall + standard shortfall12eligible
0conditional
20excluded
Exact enumeration inside the displayed action set. Deterministic tie-breakers. No remote model or solver.
Inspect the formulation07 / Customer-specific decision system
Ready on day one. More specific to your business with every decision.
Ready on day one
Hazard-specific evidence methods, canonical enterprise objects, action classes, constraint checks, and decision-right patterns.
Specialized through use
Verified dependencies, commitments, feasible-action knowledge, assumptions, approvals, execution, and outcomes deepen the customer’s decision system.
Governed reusable structure
Where customers expressly authorize it, reviewed de-identified structure can improve reusable methods without transferring customer records.
08 / Take the proof with you
Built to circulate inside the organization.
Explore anonymously, then use a decision record, readiness worksheet, or concise platform brief to move the discussion forward.
One bounded decision. Ten business days.
Bring one consequential decision.
See how CrisisFlow structures the evidence, exposure, constraints, alternatives, and authority around it.
Start with one decision